Burkina Faso vs Cuba: Arable land
Burkina Faso
28.9%
in 2023
Cuba
28.0%
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
32nd
Cuba rank
34th
Arable land over time
- Burkina Faso
- Cuba
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 28.9% against 28.0% in Cuba, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 32nd and Cuba ranks 34th of 206 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11.0% | 15.6% | 4.6% | Cuba |
| 1970s | 11.0% | 25.7% | 14.7% | Cuba |
| 1980s | 11.9% | 29.6% | 17.6% | Cuba |
| 1990s | 16.3% | 33.2% | 17.0% | Cuba |
| 2000s | 20.9% | 34.1% | 13.2% | Cuba |
| 2010s | 25.5% | 29.4% | 3.9% | Cuba |
| 2020s | 28.6% | 28.0% | 0.5% | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land, Burkina Faso or Cuba?
- Burkina Faso, at 28.9% against 28.0% in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in arable land between Burkina Faso and Cuba?
- 0.9%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Cuba rank globally for arable land?
- Burkina Faso ranks 32nd and Cuba ranks 34th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and website, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Arable land (% of land area). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.