South Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Arable land

South Africa
12.00 million hectares
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
13.50 million hectares
in 2023
South Africa rank
24th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
23rd

Arable land over time

  • South Africa
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 13.50 million hectares against 12.00 million hectares in South Africa, a difference of 1.50 million hectares.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 24th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 23rd of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 5 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 12.15 million hectares 5.82 million hectares 6.34 million hectares South Africa
1970s 12.29 million hectares 7.20 million hectares 5.09 million hectares South Africa
1980s 12.45 million hectares 8.50 million hectares 3.95 million hectares South Africa
1990s 13.40 million hectares 8.88 million hectares 4.52 million hectares South Africa
2000s 13.19 million hectares 9.68 million hectares 3.51 million hectares South Africa
2010s 12.06 million hectares 12.50 million hectares 448,200 hectares Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 12.00 million hectares 13.50 million hectares 1.50 million hectares Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land, South Africa or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 13.50 million hectares against 12.00 million hectares in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in arable land between South Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1.50 million hectares, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for arable land?
South Africa ranks 24th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 23rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Arable land (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Arable land. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-hectares/south-africa/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-hectares/south-africa/tanzania/">South Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Arable land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arable land (hectares)
Unit
hectares
Source
FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 11,871 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arable land (in hectares) includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.