Serbia vs Togo: Arable land
Serbia
2.60 million hectares
in 2023
Togo
2.65 million hectares
in 2023
Serbia rank
71st
Togo rank
70th
Arable land over time
- Serbia
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 2.65 million hectares against 2.60 million hectares in Serbia, a difference of 47,000 hectares.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 71st and Togo ranks 70th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.62 million hectares | 2.42 million hectares | 201,675 hectares | Serbia |
| 2010s | 2.60 million hectares | 2.61 million hectares | 12,210 hectares | Togo |
| 2020s | 2.61 million hectares | 2.65 million hectares | 44,500 hectares | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land, Serbia or Togo?
- Togo, at 2.65 million hectares against 2.60 million hectares in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in arable land between Serbia and Togo?
- 47,000 hectares, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Togo?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Togo rank globally for arable land?
- Serbia ranks 71st and Togo ranks 70th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Arable land (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land (in hectares) includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.