Costa Rica vs Slovenia: Arable land
Arable land over time
- Costa Rica
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 178,890 hectares against 167,133 hectares in Costa Rica, a difference of 11,757 hectares.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 142nd and Slovenia ranks 140th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 222,500 hectares | 187,375 hectares | 35,125 hectares | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 208,000 hectares | 175,966 hectares | 32,034 hectares | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 215,083 hectares | 183,525 hectares | 31,558 hectares | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 167,133 hectares | 179,012 hectares | 11,880 hectares | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land, Costa Rica or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 178,890 hectares against 167,133 hectares in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in arable land between Costa Rica and Slovenia?
- 11,757 hectares, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Slovenia rank globally for arable land?
- Costa Rica ranks 142nd and Slovenia ranks 140th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Arable land (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land (in hectares) includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.