Equatorial Guinea vs Solomon Islands: Arable land

Equatorial Guinea
0.0287 hectares per person
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0.0287 hectares per person
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
161st
Solomon Islands rank
160th

Arable land over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Solomon Islands
0.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0.0287 hectares per person against 0.0287 hectares per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 161st and Solomon Islands ranks 160th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1275 hectares per person 0.0639 hectares per person 0.0636 hectares per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0904 hectares per person 0.0526 hectares per person 0.0378 hectares per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0438 hectares per person 0.0437 hectares per person 0.0001 hectares per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0315 hectares per person 0.0311 hectares per person 0.0004 hectares per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0412 hectares per person 0.035 hectares per person 0.0062 hectares per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0382 hectares per person 0.0355 hectares per person 0.0027 hectares per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0298 hectares per person 0.0298 hectares per person 0 hectares per person Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land, Equatorial Guinea or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 0.0287 hectares per person against 0.0287 hectares per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in arable land between Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands?
0 hectares per person, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands rank globally for arable land?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 161st and Solomon Islands ranks 160th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Arable land (hectares per person). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Solomon Islands: Arable land. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-hectares-per-person/equatorial-guinea/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-hectares-per-person/equatorial-guinea/solomon-islands/">Equatorial Guinea vs Solomon Islands: Arable land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arable land (hectares per person)
Unit
hectares per person
Source
FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
253 places, 14,649 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arable land (hectares per person) includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.