What is the difference in arable land between Chile and Cyprus?

0.0012 hectares per person, with Cyprus ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Cyprus?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Arable land (hectares per person). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Cyprus: Arable land

Chile

0.0716 hectares per person

in 2023

Cyprus

0.0728 hectares per person

in 2023

Chile rank

137th

Cyprus rank

136th

Arable land over time

Chile
Cyprus

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 0.0728 hectares per person against 0.0716 hectares per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0012 hectares per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.

Chile ranks 137th and Cyprus ranks 136th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Cyprus in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Cyprus	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.4137 hectares per person	0.5206 hectares per person	0.107 hectares per person	Cyprus
1970s	0.3825 hectares per person	0.3047 hectares per person	0.0778 hectares per person	Chile
1980s	0.2785 hectares per person	0.1492 hectares per person	0.1294 hectares per person	Chile
1990s	0.1565 hectares per person	0.1204 hectares per person	0.0361 hectares per person	Chile
2000s	0.0919 hectares per person	0.1014 hectares per person	0.0095 hectares per person	Cyprus
2010s	0.0797 hectares per person	0.0733 hectares per person	0.0064 hectares per person	Chile
2020s	0.0715 hectares per person	0.0728 hectares per person	0.0014 hectares per person	Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land, Chile or Cyprus?: Cyprus, at 0.0728 hectares per person against 0.0716 hectares per person in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in arable land between Chile and Cyprus?: 0.0012 hectares per person, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Cyprus?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Cyprus rank globally for arable land?: Chile ranks 137th and Cyprus ranks 136th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Arable land (hectares per person). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Cyprus: Arable land. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-hectares-per-person/chile/cyprus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-hectares-per-person/chile/cyprus/">Chile vs Cyprus: Arable land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Arable land (hectares per person)
Unit: hectares per person
Source: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 253 places, 14,649 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 06 August 2026

Arable land (hectares per person) includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.