British Virgin Islands vs South Korea: Arable land

British Virgin Islands
0.0257 hectares per person
in 2023
South Korea
0.0282 hectares per person
in 2023
British Virgin Islands rank
165th
South Korea rank
162nd

Arable land over time

  • British Virgin Islands
  • South Korea
0.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 0.0282 hectares per person against 0.0257 hectares per person in British Virgin Islands, a difference of 0.0025 hectares per person.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times British Virgin Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was British Virgin Islands ahead.

British Virgin Islands ranks 165th and South Korea ranks 162nd of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, British Virgin Islands averaged higher in 6 and South Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade British Virgin Islands South Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1685 hectares per person 0.0738 hectares per person 0.0947 hectares per person British Virgin Islands
1970s 0.1905 hectares per person 0.06 hectares per person 0.1305 hectares per person British Virgin Islands
1980s 0.214 hectares per person 0.05 hectares per person 0.164 hectares per person British Virgin Islands
1990s 0.1087 hectares per person 0.0406 hectares per person 0.0681 hectares per person British Virgin Islands
2000s 0.043 hectares per person 0.034 hectares per person 0.0091 hectares per person British Virgin Islands
2010s 0.0311 hectares per person 0.0286 hectares per person 0.0025 hectares per person British Virgin Islands
2020s 0.0263 hectares per person 0.0264 hectares per person 0.0002 hectares per person South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land, British Virgin Islands or South Korea?
South Korea, at 0.0282 hectares per person against 0.0257 hectares per person in British Virgin Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in arable land between British Virgin Islands and South Korea?
0.0025 hectares per person, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and South Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do British Virgin Islands and South Korea rank globally for arable land?
British Virgin Islands ranks 165th and South Korea ranks 162nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Arable land (hectares per person). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

British Virgin Islands vs South Korea: Arable land. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-hectares-per-person/british-virgin-islands/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-hectares-per-person/british-virgin-islands/korea-rep/">British Virgin Islands vs South Korea: Arable land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arable land (hectares per person)
Unit
hectares per person
Source
FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
253 places, 14,649 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arable land (hectares per person) includes land defined by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded.