Nicaragua vs South Sudan: Arable land (hectares), per capita
Nicaragua
0.2203 hectares per person
in 2023
South Sudan
0.2168 hectares per person
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
53rd
South Sudan rank
55th
Arable land (hectares), per capita over time
- Nicaragua
- South Sudan
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0.2203 hectares per person against 0.2168 hectares per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0035 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 53rd and South Sudan ranks 55th of 206 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.243 hectares per person | 0.2347 hectares per person | 0.0083 hectares per person | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 0.2247 hectares per person | 0.2196 hectares per person | 0.0051 hectares per person | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land (hectares), per capita, Nicaragua or South Sudan?
- Nicaragua, at 0.2203 hectares per person against 0.2168 hectares per person in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in arable land (hectares), per capita between Nicaragua and South Sudan?
- 0.0035 hectares per person, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and South Sudan rank globally for arable land (hectares), per capita?
- Nicaragua ranks 53rd and South Sudan ranks 55th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land (hectares), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land (hectares) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.