Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Peru: Aquatic Animals, Others β Feed
Aquatic Animals, Others β Feed over time
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- Peru
How they compare
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Peru, a difference of 0 1000 t.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 27 groups.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher aquatic animals, others β feed, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Peru?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in aquatic animals, others β feed between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Peru?
- 0 1000 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Peru?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Peru rank globally for aquatic animals, others β feed?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Aquatic Animals, Others β Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.