Chile vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Apples — Gross Production Value

Chile
613,160 1000 Int$
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1.66 million 1000 Int$
in 2024
Chile rank
11th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
7th

Apples — Gross Production Value over time

  • Chile
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 1.66 million 1000 Int$ against 613,160 1000 Int$ in Chile, a difference of 1.05 million 1000 Int$.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.7 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 11th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 96 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 55,329 1000 Int$ 20,141 1000 Int$ 35,188 1000 Int$ Chile
1970s 66,698 1000 Int$ 21,551 1000 Int$ 45,147 1000 Int$ Chile
1980s 211,145 1000 Int$ 17,399 1000 Int$ 193,747 1000 Int$ Chile
1990s 413,237 1000 Int$ 392,605 1000 Int$ 20,632 1000 Int$ Chile
2000s 591,169 1000 Int$ 728,451 1000 Int$ 137,282 1000 Int$ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 786,652 1000 Int$ 1.23 million 1000 Int$ 443,060 1000 Int$ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 703,889 1000 Int$ 1.61 million 1000 Int$ 903,847 1000 Int$ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher apples — gross production value, Chile or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 1.66 million 1000 Int$ against 613,160 1000 Int$ in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in apples — gross production value between Chile and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
1.05 million 1000 Int$, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chile and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for apples — gross production value?
Chile ranks 11th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 96 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Apples — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Apples — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/apples-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i/chile/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/apples-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i/chile/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Chile vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Apples — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Apples — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)
Unit
1000 Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
130 places, 6,732 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.