Myanmar vs South America: Alcoholic Beverages — Other uses

Myanmar
1.04 million t
in 2013
South America
10.15 million t
in 2013
Myanmar rank
5th
South America rank
3rd

Alcoholic Beverages — Other uses over time

  • Myanmar
  • South America
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119872013

How they compare

South America currently reports 10.15 million t against 1.04 million t in Myanmar, a difference of 9.11 million t.

That makes South America's figure about 9.8 times Myanmar's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, South America has been ahead every year.

Myanmar ranks 5th and South America ranks 3rd of 158 countries.

South America has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar South America Difference Ahead
1960s 56,889 t 540,187 t 483,298 t South America
1970s 144,000 t 1.29 million t 1.15 million t South America
1980s 384,000 t 4.70 million t 4.32 million t South America
1990s 443,200 t 7.44 million t 7.00 million t South America
2000s 894,783 t 11.48 million t 10.58 million t South America
2010s 1.03 million t 10.68 million t 9.65 million t South America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher alcoholic beverages — other uses, Myanmar or South America?
South America, at 10.15 million t against 1.04 million t in Myanmar as of 2013.
What is the difference in alcoholic beverages — other uses between Myanmar and South America?
9.11 million t, with South America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and South America?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Myanmar and South America rank globally for alcoholic beverages — other uses?
Myanmar ranks 5th and South America ranks 3rd of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Alcoholic Beverages — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs South America: Alcoholic Beverages — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/alcoholic-beverages-other-uses-non-food/myanmar/south-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/alcoholic-beverages-other-uses-non-food/myanmar/south-america/">Myanmar vs South America: Alcoholic Beverages — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Alcoholic Beverages — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
199 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.