United Republic of Tanzania vs Yugoslav SFR: Alcoholic Beverages — Losses

United Republic of Tanzania
34,278 t
in 2013
Yugoslav SFR
80,000 t
in 1991
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd
Yugoslav SFR rank
3rd

Alcoholic Beverages — Losses over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Yugoslav SFR
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119872013

How they compare

Yugoslav SFR currently reports 80,000 t against 34,278 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 45,722 t.

That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 2.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 3rd of 4 countries.

Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 4,793 t 8,444 t 3,651 t Yugoslav SFR
1970s 5,708 t 19,000 t 13,292 t Yugoslav SFR
1980s 7,670 t 31,159 t 23,489 t Yugoslav SFR
1990s 7,865 t 70,000 t 62,135 t Yugoslav SFR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher alcoholic beverages — losses, United Republic of Tanzania or Yugoslav SFR?
Yugoslav SFR, at 80,000 t against 34,278 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 1991.
What is the difference in alcoholic beverages — losses between United Republic of Tanzania and Yugoslav SFR?
45,722 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Yugoslav SFR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for alcoholic beverages — losses?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 3rd of 4 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Alcoholic Beverages — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs Yugoslav SFR: Alcoholic Beverages — Losses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/alcoholic-beverages-losses/united-republic-of-tanzania/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/alcoholic-beverages-losses/united-republic-of-tanzania/yugoslav-sfr/">United Republic of Tanzania vs Yugoslav SFR: Alcoholic Beverages — Losses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Alcoholic Beverages — Losses
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
45 places, 2,231 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.