Malaysia vs Sierra Leone: Alcoholic Beverages — Domestic supply quantity

Malaysia
290,020 t
in 2013
Sierra Leone
266,881 t
in 2013
Malaysia rank
82nd
Sierra Leone rank
83rd

Alcoholic Beverages — Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Malaysia
  • Sierra Leone
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119872013

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 290,020 t against 266,881 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 23,139 t.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Malaysia ranks 82nd and Sierra Leone ranks 83rd of 171 countries.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 41,292 t 145,390 t 104,098 t Sierra Leone
1970s 64,099 t 143,299 t 79,200 t Sierra Leone
1980s 112,204 t 168,038 t 55,834 t Sierra Leone
1990s 98,232 t 176,874 t 78,643 t Sierra Leone
2000s 119,139 t 228,054 t 108,915 t Sierra Leone
2010s 251,061 t 262,558 t 11,496 t Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher alcoholic beverages — domestic supply quantity, Malaysia or Sierra Leone?
Malaysia, at 290,020 t against 266,881 t in Sierra Leone as of 2013.
What is the difference in alcoholic beverages — domestic supply quantity between Malaysia and Sierra Leone?
23,139 t, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sierra Leone?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Malaysia and Sierra Leone rank globally for alcoholic beverages — domestic supply quantity?
Malaysia ranks 82nd and Sierra Leone ranks 83rd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Alcoholic Beverages — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Sierra Leone: Alcoholic Beverages — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/alcoholic-beverages-domestic-supply-quantity/malaysia/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/alcoholic-beverages-domestic-supply-quantity/malaysia/sierra-leone/">Malaysia vs Sierra Leone: Alcoholic Beverages — Domestic supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Alcoholic Beverages — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
215 places, 10,338 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.