South Sudan vs Zambia: Agricultural value added per worker
Agricultural value added per worker over time
- South Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 487.05 against 304.36 in Zambia, a difference of 182.69.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.6 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 171st and Zambia ranks 173rd of 175 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 451.43 | 394.2 | 57.23 | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 415.66 | 394.66 | 21.01 | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural value added per worker, South Sudan or Zambia?
- South Sudan, at 487.05 against 304.36 in Zambia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in agricultural value added per worker between South Sudan and Zambia?
- 182.69, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zambia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do South Sudan and Zambia rank globally for agricultural value added per worker?
- South Sudan ranks 171st and Zambia ranks 173rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (World Development Indicators) and ILO (ILOSTAT) (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Agricultural value added per worker. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural value added per worker is calculated by dividing the amount of economic value generated from farming, forestry and fishing by the number of people who work in these sectors. This data is expressed in US dollars. It is adjusted for inflation but does not account for differences in living costs between countries.