Jordan vs United Arab Emirates: Agricultural value added per worker
Agricultural value added per worker over time
- Jordan
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 37,801 against 33,123 in Jordan, a difference of 4,678.
That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 30th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 175 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,825 | 24,335 | 4,510 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2000s | 19,885 | 29,546 | 9,661 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 28,518 | 19,278 | 9,241 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 28,395 | 36,663 | 8,267 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural value added per worker, Jordan or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 37,801 against 33,123 in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agricultural value added per worker between Jordan and United Arab Emirates?
- 4,678, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and United Arab Emirates?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and United Arab Emirates rank globally for agricultural value added per worker?
- Jordan ranks 30th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (World Development Indicators) and ILO (ILOSTAT) (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Agricultural value added per worker. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural value added per worker is calculated by dividing the amount of economic value generated from farming, forestry and fishing by the number of people who work in these sectors. This data is expressed in US dollars. It is adjusted for inflation but does not account for differences in living costs between countries.