Guatemala vs Papua New Guinea: Agricultural value added per worker
Guatemala
3,459
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
3,496
in 2024
Guatemala rank
120th
Papua New Guinea rank
117th
Agricultural value added per worker over time
- Guatemala
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 3,496 against 3,459 in Guatemala, a difference of 37.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Guatemala ranks 120th and Papua New Guinea ranks 117th of 175 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,021 | 5,663 | 2,643 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 3,184 | 4,914 | 1,730 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 3,504 | 3,544 | 39.79 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural value added per worker, Guatemala or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 3,496 against 3,459 in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agricultural value added per worker between Guatemala and Papua New Guinea?
- 37, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Papua New Guinea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Papua New Guinea rank globally for agricultural value added per worker?
- Guatemala ranks 120th and Papua New Guinea ranks 117th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (World Development Indicators) and ILO (ILOSTAT) (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Agricultural value added per worker. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural value added per worker is calculated by dividing the amount of economic value generated from farming, forestry and fishing by the number of people who work in these sectors. This data is expressed in US dollars. It is adjusted for inflation but does not account for differences in living costs between countries.