Comoros vs Namibia: Agricultural value added per worker

Comoros
3,895
in 2025
Namibia
3,836
in 2025
Comoros rank
110th
Namibia rank
111th

Agricultural value added per worker over time

  • Comoros
  • Namibia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199120082025

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 3,895 against 3,836 in Namibia, a difference of 59.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Namibia ahead.

Comoros ranks 110th and Namibia ranks 111th of 175 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,350 4,351 1,001 Namibia
2000s 3,558 6,319 2,761 Namibia
2010s 4,056 4,737 681.07 Namibia
2020s 3,794 4,307 512.82 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural value added per worker, Comoros or Namibia?
Comoros, at 3,895 against 3,836 in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agricultural value added per worker between Comoros and Namibia?
59, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Namibia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Namibia rank globally for agricultural value added per worker?
Comoros ranks 110th and Namibia ranks 111th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank (World Development Indicators) and ILO (ILOSTAT) (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Agricultural value added per worker. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural value added per worker
Source
World Bank (World Development Indicators) and ILO (ILOSTAT) (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 5,606 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agricultural value added per worker is calculated by dividing the amount of economic value generated from farming, forestry and fishing by the number of people who work in these sectors. This data is expressed in US dollars. It is adjusted for inflation but does not account for differences in living costs between countries.