Afghanistan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agricultural value added per worker
Agricultural value added per worker over time
- Afghanistan
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 1,153 against 855.37 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 297.63.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.3 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 158th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 161st of 175 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,002 | 645.84 | 355.94 | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 1,218 | 791.11 | 427.14 | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 1,223 | 838.92 | 384.42 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural value added per worker, Afghanistan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Afghanistan, at 1,153 against 855.37 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agricultural value added per worker between Afghanistan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 297.63, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for agricultural value added per worker?
- Afghanistan ranks 158th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 161st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (World Development Indicators) and ILO (ILOSTAT) (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Agricultural value added per worker. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural value added per worker is calculated by dividing the amount of economic value generated from farming, forestry and fishing by the number of people who work in these sectors. This data is expressed in US dollars. It is adjusted for inflation but does not account for differences in living costs between countries.