Guyana vs Mauritius: Agriculture, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Agriculture, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Guyana
- Mauritius
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 59.55 million USD against 47.58 million USD in Mauritius, a difference of 11.97 million USD.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.3 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mauritius ahead.
Guyana ranks 32nd and Mauritius ranks 34th of 61 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 58.36 million USD | 61.55 million USD | 3.19 million USD | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 59.55 million USD | 71.37 million USD | 11.82 million USD | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$, Guyana or Mauritius?
- Guyana, at 59.55 million USD against 47.58 million USD in Mauritius as of 2020.
- What is the difference in agriculture, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Guyana and Mauritius?
- 11.97 million USD, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Mauritius?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Guyana and Mauritius rank globally for agriculture, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$?
- Guyana ranks 32nd and Mauritius ranks 34th of 61 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.