Chad vs Lesotho: Agriculture production index

Chad
106.95 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
in 2011
Lesotho
106.79 gross, 1999-2001 = 100
in 2011
Chad rank
43rd
Lesotho rank
44th

Agriculture production index over time

  • Chad
  • Lesotho
406080100120196119862011

How they compare

Chad currently reports 106.95 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 against 106.79 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Chad ranks 43rd and Lesotho ranks 44th of 53 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 44.89 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 74.05 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 29.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Lesotho
1970s 44.6 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 83.1 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 38.5 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Lesotho
1980s 50.95 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 92.56 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 41.61 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Lesotho
1990s 71.94 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 95.59 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 23.65 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Lesotho
2000s 95.64 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 99.78 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 4.15 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Lesotho
2010s 106.08 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 108.62 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 2.55 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture production index, Chad or Lesotho?
Chad, at 106.95 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 against 106.79 gross, 1999-2001 = 100 in Lesotho as of 2011.
What is the difference in agriculture production index between Chad and Lesotho?
0.16 gross, 1999-2001 = 100, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Lesotho?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
How do Chad and Lesotho rank globally for agriculture production index?
Chad ranks 43rd and Lesotho ranks 44th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as Agriculture production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Lesotho: Agriculture production index. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-production-index-gross-1999-2001-100/chad/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-production-index-gross-1999-2001-100/chad/lesotho/">Chad vs Lesotho: Agriculture production index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture production index (gross, 1999-2001 = 100)
Unit
gross, 1999-2001 = 100
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
54 places, 2,689 data points, 1961–2011
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2004-2006. They are based on the sum of price-weighted quantities of different agricultural commodities produced after deductions of quantities used as seed and feed weighted in a similar manner. The resulting aggregate represents, therefore, disposable production for any use except as seed and feed. All the indices at the country, regional and world levels are calculated by the Laspeyres formula. Production quantities of each commodity are weighted by 2004-2006 average international commodity prices and summed for each year. To obtain the index, the aggregate for a given year is divided by the average aggregate for the base period 2004-2006. Since the FAO indices are based on the concept of agriculture as a single enterprise, amounts of seed and feed are subtracted from the production data to avoid double counting them, once in the production data and once with the crops or livestock produced from them. Deductions for seed (in the case of eggs, for hatching) and for livestock and poultry feed apply to both domestically produced and imported commodities. They cover only primary agricultural products destined to animal feed (e.g. maize, potatoes, milk, etc.). Processed and semi-processed feed items such as bran, oilcakes, meals and molasses have been completely excluded from the calculations at all stages. should be noted that when calculating indices of agricultural, food and nonfood production, all intermediate primary inputs of agricultural origin are deducted. However, for indices of any other commodity group, only inputs originating from within the same group are deducted; thus, only seed is removed from the group “crops” and from all crop subgroups, such as cereals, oil crops, etc.; and both feed and seed originating from within the livestock sector (e.g. milk feed, hatching eggs) are removed from the group “livestock products”. For the main two livestock subgroups, namely, meat and milk, only feed originating from the respective subgroup is removed. The ”international commodity prices” are used in order to avoid the use of exchange rates for obtaining continental and world aggregates, and also to improve and facilitate international comparative analysis of productivity at the national level. These” international prices”, expressed in so-called ""international dollars”, are derived using a Geary-Khamis formula for the agricultural sector. This method assigns a single “price” to each commodity. For example, one metric ton of wheat has the same price regardless of the country where it was produced. The currency unit in which the prices are expressed has no influence on the indices published. The commodities covered in the computation of indices of agricultural production are all crops and livestock products originating in each country. Practically all products are covered, with the main exception of fodder crops. The category of food production includes commodities that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Accordingly, coffee and tea are excluded along with inedible commodities because, although edible, they have practically no nutritive value. Aggregates are the sum of available data.