Eritrea vs Libya: Agriculture production index
Agriculture production index over time
- Eritrea
- Libya
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 110.99 1999-2001 = 100 against 110.99 1999-2001 = 100 in Libya, a difference of 0 1999-2001 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Libya ahead.
Eritrea ranks 37th and Libya ranks 37th of 53 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 81.59 1999-2001 = 100 | 92.68 1999-2001 = 100 | 11.09 1999-2001 = 100 | Libya |
| 2000s | 93.3 1999-2001 = 100 | 100.42 1999-2001 = 100 | 7.12 1999-2001 = 100 | Libya |
| 2010s | 109.44 1999-2001 = 100 | 110.84 1999-2001 = 100 | 1.41 1999-2001 = 100 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture production index, Eritrea or Libya?
- Eritrea, at 110.99 1999-2001 = 100 against 110.99 1999-2001 = 100 in Libya as of 2011.
- What is the difference in agriculture production index between Eritrea and Libya?
- 0 1999-2001 = 100, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Libya?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Libya rank globally for agriculture production index?
- Eritrea ranks 37th and Libya ranks 37th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as Agriculture production index (1999-2001 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2004-2006. They are based on the sum of price-weighted quantities of different agricultural commodities produced after deductions of quantities used as seed and feed weighted in a similar manner. The resulting aggregate represents, therefore, disposable production for any use except as seed and feed.