Russia vs Sierra Leone: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Russia
0.1%
in 2023
Sierra Leone
0.0%
in 2023
Russia rank
85th
Sierra Leone rank
88th
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Russia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Russia currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Russia's figure about 10.8 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Russia ranks 85th and Sierra Leone ranks 88th of 225 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.9% | 31.5% | 32.4% | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | -0.3% | 12.9% | 13.1% | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.4% | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Russia or Sierra Leone?
- Russia, at 0.1% against 0.0% in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Russia and Sierra Leone?
- 0.1%, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Sierra Leone?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Russia and Sierra Leone rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Russia ranks 85th and Sierra Leone ranks 88th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.