Oman vs Tanzania: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Oman
3.7%
in 2023
Tanzania
3.9%
in 2023
Oman rank
42nd
Tanzania rank
41st
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Oman
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 3.9% against 3.7% in Oman, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Tanzania ahead.
Oman ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 41st of 225 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.0% | 9.1% | 8.2% | Tanzania |
| 1980s | 1.4% | 7.9% | 6.5% | Tanzania |
| 1990s | 1.2% | 4.3% | 3.1% | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 28.2% | 7.8% | 20.5% | Oman |
| 2010s | 5.3% | 8.6% | 3.3% | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 2.4% | 5.0% | 2.6% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Oman or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 3.9% against 3.7% in Oman as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Oman and Tanzania?
- 0.2%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Tanzania?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
- How do Oman and Tanzania rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Oman ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 41st of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.