Marshall Islands vs Mauritania: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Marshall Islands
0.0%
in 2023
Mauritania
0.0%
in 2023
Marshall Islands rank
91st
Mauritania rank
91st
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritania
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 91st and Mauritania ranks 91st of 225 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | -13.5% | 0.0% | 13.5% | Mauritania |
| 2020s | -10.5% | 0.0% | 10.5% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Marshall Islands or Mauritania?
- Marshall Islands, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Marshall Islands and Mauritania?
- 0.0%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Mauritania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Marshall Islands and Mauritania rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Marshall Islands ranks 91st and Mauritania ranks 91st of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.