Hong Kong vs Samoa: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Hong Kong
-21.6%
in 2023
Samoa
-20.0%
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
220th
Samoa rank
218th
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Hong Kong
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports -20.0% against -21.6% in Hong Kong, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Samoa ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 220th and Samoa ranks 218th of 225 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -22.7% | 12.3% | 35.1% | Samoa |
| 1980s | -13.8% | 12.4% | 26.2% | Samoa |
| 1990s | -13.5% | -30.0% | 16.5% | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | -14.3% | -18.3% | 4.0% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | -21.6% | 39.8% | 61.4% | Samoa |
| 2020s | -24.4% | -1.8% | 22.6% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Hong Kong or Samoa?
- Samoa, at -20.0% against -21.6% in Hong Kong as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Hong Kong and Samoa?
- 1.6%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Samoa?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Samoa rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Hong Kong ranks 220th and Samoa ranks 218th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.