Grenada vs Namibia: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Grenada
0.0%
in 2023
Namibia
0.0%
in 2023
Grenada rank
90th
Namibia rank
88th
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Grenada
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Grenada, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Namibia ahead.
Grenada ranks 90th and Namibia ranks 88th of 224 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -9.1% | 0.0% | 9.1% | Namibia |
| 1980s | -27.3% | 0.0% | 27.3% | Namibia |
| 1990s | -20.0% | 0.2% | 20.2% | Namibia |
| 2000s | -8.0% | 0.2% | 8.2% | Namibia |
| 2010s | -20.9% | -0.0% | 20.9% | Namibia |
| 2020s | -10.0% | 0.0% | 10.0% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Grenada or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Grenada and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Namibia?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Namibia rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Grenada ranks 90th and Namibia ranks 88th of 224 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.