Finland vs Guyana: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Finland
0.2%
in 2023
Guyana
0.1%
in 2023
Finland rank
83rd
Guyana rank
84th
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Finland
- Guyana
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.2% against 0.1% in Guyana, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Guyana ahead.
Finland ranks 83rd and Guyana ranks 84th of 225 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Guyana in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -7.6% | -11.8% | 4.2% | Finland |
| 1980s | -6.9% | -38.0% | 31.1% | Finland |
| 1990s | -5.6% | -2.9% | 2.7% | Guyana |
| 2000s | -1.4% | 0.8% | 2.2% | Guyana |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.4% | Finland |
| 2020s | -0.6% | 0.1% | 0.7% | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Finland or Guyana?
- Finland, at 0.2% against 0.1% in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Finland and Guyana?
- 0.1%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Guyana?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Guyana rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Finland ranks 83rd and Guyana ranks 84th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.