Estonia vs Philippines: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Estonia
2.4%
in 2023
Philippines
2.0%
in 2023
Estonia rank
50th
Philippines rank
53rd
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Estonia
- Philippines
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 2.4% against 2.0% in Philippines, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Philippines ahead.
Estonia ranks 50th and Philippines ranks 53rd of 225 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -21.1% | 3.9% | 25.0% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 12.9% | 8.4% | 4.5% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 3.4% | 2.9% | 0.5% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Estonia or Philippines?
- Estonia, at 2.4% against 2.0% in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Estonia and Philippines?
- 0.4%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Philippines?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Philippines rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Estonia ranks 50th and Philippines ranks 53rd of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.