El Salvador vs Fiji: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
El Salvador
-1.9%
in 2023
Fiji
-1.7%
in 2023
El Salvador rank
166th
Fiji rank
163rd
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- El Salvador
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports -1.7% against -1.9% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 166th and Fiji ranks 163rd of 225 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Fiji in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.9% | 12.5% | 11.6% | Fiji |
| 1980s | 1.7% | 36.0% | 34.3% | Fiji |
| 1990s | 2.0% | 20.2% | 18.2% | Fiji |
| 2000s | -2.2% | -14.0% | 11.8% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | -2.9% | -8.4% | 5.5% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | -2.3% | -2.0% | 0.3% | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, El Salvador or Fiji?
- Fiji, at -1.7% against -1.9% in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between El Salvador and Fiji?
- 0.2%, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Fiji?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Fiji rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- El Salvador ranks 166th and Fiji ranks 163rd of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.