Cook Islands vs Nauru: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Cook Islands
0.0%
in 2023
Nauru
0.0%
in 2023
Cook Islands rank
91st
Nauru rank
91st
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Cook Islands
- Nauru
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Nauru, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 53 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Cook Islands ranks 91st and Nauru ranks 91st of 225 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0% | 14.8% | 14.8% | Nauru |
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 1990s | -15.0% | 0.0% | 15.0% | Nauru |
| 2000s | -44.0% | 0.0% | 44.0% | Nauru |
| 2010s | -29.7% | 0.0% | 29.7% | Nauru |
| 2020s | -1.2% | 0.0% | 1.2% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Cook Islands or Nauru?
- Cook Islands, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 0.0%, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Nauru rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Cook Islands ranks 91st and Nauru ranks 91st of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.