Botswana vs Libya: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Botswana
-0.1%
in 2023
Libya
-0.0%
in 2023
Botswana rank
136th
Libya rank
133rd
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Botswana
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports -0.0% against -0.1% in Botswana, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Libya ahead.
Botswana ranks 136th and Libya ranks 133rd of 225 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0% | 17.2% | 17.2% | Libya |
| 1980s | 0.0% | 10.2% | 10.2% | Libya |
| 1990s | -0.3% | 1.0% | 1.3% | Libya |
| 2000s | -0.3% | -0.6% | 0.3% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.2% | -0.4% | 0.6% | Botswana |
| 2020s | -0.1% | -0.0% | 0.1% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Botswana or Libya?
- Libya, at -0.0% against -0.1% in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Botswana and Libya?
- 0.1%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Libya?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Libya rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Botswana ranks 136th and Libya ranks 133rd of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.