Belize vs Turkmenistan: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Belize
13.8%
in 2023
Turkmenistan
12.1%
in 2023
Belize rank
11th
Turkmenistan rank
13th
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Belize
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Belize currently reports 13.8% against 12.1% in Turkmenistan, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 11th and Turkmenistan ranks 13th of 225 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.1% | -1.9% | 7.0% | Belize |
| 2010s | 8.9% | 4.6% | 4.3% | Belize |
| 2020s | 14.5% | 15.3% | 0.8% | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Belize or Turkmenistan?
- Belize, at 13.8% against 12.1% in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Belize and Turkmenistan?
- 1.7%, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Turkmenistan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Turkmenistan rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Belize ranks 11th and Turkmenistan ranks 13th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.