Belize vs Burundi: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Belize
13.8%
in 2023
Burundi
14.2%
in 2023
Belize rank
11th
Burundi rank
10th
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Belize
- Burundi
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 14.2% against 13.8% in Belize, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Burundi ahead.
Belize ranks 11th and Burundi ranks 10th of 225 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 5 and Burundi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 7.4% | 23.7% | 16.3% | Burundi |
| 1980s | 20.3% | 2.8% | 17.6% | Belize |
| 1990s | 37.3% | -2.8% | 40.1% | Belize |
| 2000s | 7.3% | -8.9% | 16.2% | Belize |
| 2010s | 8.9% | 5.2% | 3.7% | Belize |
| 2020s | 14.5% | 14.0% | 0.5% | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Belize or Burundi?
- Burundi, at 14.2% against 13.8% in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Belize and Burundi?
- 0.4%, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Burundi?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Burundi rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Belize ranks 11th and Burundi ranks 10th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.