Azerbaijan vs Nicaragua: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Azerbaijan
0.2%
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.4%
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
78th
Nicaragua rank
76th
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Azerbaijan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0.4% against 0.2% in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.7 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Nicaragua ranks 76th of 225 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.6% | 14.4% | 9.8% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 0.4% | -2.1% | 2.5% | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.2% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Azerbaijan or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 0.4% against 0.2% in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Azerbaijan and Nicaragua?
- 0.2%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Nicaragua?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Nicaragua rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Nicaragua ranks 76th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.