Azerbaijan vs New Caledonia: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Azerbaijan
0.2%
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.2%
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
78th
New Caledonia rank
80th
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Azerbaijan
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.3 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 78th and New Caledonia ranks 80th of 225 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.6% | -3.1% | 7.7% | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 0.4% | -19.2% | 19.6% | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.2% | -2.6% | 2.9% | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Azerbaijan or New Caledonia?
- Azerbaijan, at 0.2% against 0.2% in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Azerbaijan and New Caledonia?
- 0.0%, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and New Caledonia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and New Caledonia rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Azerbaijan ranks 78th and New Caledonia ranks 80th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.