Angola vs Bhutan: Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade
Angola
1.3%
in 2023
Bhutan
1.4%
in 2023
Angola rank
63rd
Bhutan rank
61st
Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade over time
- Angola
- Bhutan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 1.4% against 1.3% in Angola, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Bhutan ahead.
Angola ranks 63rd and Bhutan ranks 61st of 225 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Bhutan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -0.4% | 7.4% | 7.9% | Bhutan |
| 1980s | -0.9% | 11.7% | 12.6% | Bhutan |
| 1990s | -0.3% | 21.4% | 21.7% | Bhutan |
| 2000s | -0.3% | 7.4% | 7.7% | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 2.7% | -8.5% | 11.2% | Angola |
| 2020s | 1.6% | 0.4% | 1.2% | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade, Angola or Bhutan?
- Bhutan, at 1.4% against 1.3% in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade between Angola and Bhutan?
- 0.1%, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Bhutan?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Bhutan rank globally for is agricultural land expanding? change over the prior decade?
- Angola ranks 63rd and Bhutan ranks 61st of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Is agricultural land expanding? Change over the prior decade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage change in surface area devoted to agriculture with respect to 10 years before. Negative values imply that surface area has decreased with respect to the previous decade. This data is used to assess which countries may have already peaked in their agricultural land use.