New Zealand vs Romania: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

New Zealand
60.8 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
60.39 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
52nd
Romania rank
53rd

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Romania
20406080100196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 60.8 1000 USD per square kilometre against 60.39 1000 USD per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.41 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

New Zealand ranks 52nd and Romania ranks 53rd of 140 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 24.99 1000 USD per square kilometre 50.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 25.7 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1970s 29.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 70.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 41.5 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1980s 34.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 87.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 52.71 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1990s 39.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 71.54 1000 USD per square kilometre 31.75 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2000s 48.28 1000 USD per square kilometre 69.52 1000 USD per square kilometre 21.24 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2010s 57.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 72.7 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.6 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2020s 61.3 1000 USD per square kilometre 62.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.27 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), New Zealand or Romania?
New Zealand, at 60.8 1000 USD per square kilometre against 60.39 1000 USD per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between New Zealand and Romania?
0.41 1000 USD per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Romania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Romania rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
New Zealand ranks 52nd and Romania ranks 53rd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Romania: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/romania/">New Zealand vs Romania: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.