Mozambique vs Zambia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Mozambique
9.59 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
8.37 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
115th
Zambia rank
118th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Mozambique
  • Zambia
02.557.510196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 9.59 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.37 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 1.22 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 115th and Zambia ranks 118th of 140 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.84 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7429 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre Mozambique
1970s 2.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.08 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 2.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 2.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.06 1000 USD per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 4.72 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 6.37 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.16 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 9.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.23 1000 USD per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Mozambique or Zambia?
Mozambique, at 9.59 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.37 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Mozambique and Zambia?
1.22 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Zambia rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Mozambique ranks 115th and Zambia ranks 118th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Zambia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/zambia/">Mozambique vs Zambia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.