Malawi vs Singapore: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Malawi
127.68 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
137.3 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
21st
Singapore rank
18th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Malawi
  • Singapore
02505007501.0k196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 137.3 1000 USD per square kilometre against 127.68 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 9.62 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 21st and Singapore ranks 18th of 140 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 8.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 459.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 451.56 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 12.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 878.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 865.97 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 14.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 795.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 780.68 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 23.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 250.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 226.76 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 44.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 90.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 46.08 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 88.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 117.83 1000 USD per square kilometre 29.59 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 123.78 1000 USD per square kilometre 141.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 17.83 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Malawi or Singapore?
Singapore, at 137.3 1000 USD per square kilometre against 127.68 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Malawi and Singapore?
9.62 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Singapore?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Singapore rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Malawi ranks 21st and Singapore ranks 18th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Singapore: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/singapore/">Malawi vs Singapore: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.