How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Kazakhstan?

30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guyana vs Kazakhstan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Guyana

2.45 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan

4.12 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Guyana rank

134th

Kazakhstan rank

131st

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Guyana
Kazakhstan

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 4.12 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.45 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guyana, a difference of 1.67 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.7 times Guyana's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Guyana ranks 134th and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 140 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guyana	Kazakhstan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.6005 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.62 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.02 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2000s	0.6166 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.05 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.43 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2010s	1.52 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.63 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.11 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2020s	2.33 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.16 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.83 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Guyana or Kazakhstan?: Kazakhstan, at 4.12 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.45 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Guyana and Kazakhstan?: 1.67 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Kazakhstan?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Guyana and Kazakhstan rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Guyana ranks 134th and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Kazakhstan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/guyana/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/guyana/kazakhstan/">Guyana vs Kazakhstan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.