China vs Singapore: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

China
152.21 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
137.3 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
16th
Singapore rank
18th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • China
  • Singapore
02004006008001.0k196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 152.21 1000 USD per square kilometre against 137.3 1000 USD per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 14.91 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

China ranks 16th and Singapore ranks 18th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 19 1000 USD per square kilometre 459.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 440.62 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 26.3 1000 USD per square kilometre 878.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 852.25 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 40.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 795.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 755.33 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 66.9 1000 USD per square kilometre 258.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 191.19 1000 USD per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 98.97 1000 USD per square kilometre 90.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.65 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2010s 131.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 117.83 1000 USD per square kilometre 13.35 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2020s 146.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 141.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.07 1000 USD per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), China or Singapore?
China, at 152.21 1000 USD per square kilometre against 137.3 1000 USD per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between China and Singapore?
14.91 1000 USD per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Singapore rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
China ranks 16th and Singapore ranks 18th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Singapore: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/singapore/">China vs Singapore: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.