China vs Mauritius: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

China
152.21 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
189.34 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
16th
Mauritius rank
13th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • China
  • Mauritius
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 189.34 1000 USD per square kilometre against 152.21 1000 USD per square kilometre in China, a difference of 37.13 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times China's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

China ranks 16th and Mauritius ranks 13th of 140 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 19 1000 USD per square kilometre 138.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 119.32 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 26.3 1000 USD per square kilometre 151.93 1000 USD per square kilometre 125.63 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 40.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 155.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 115.12 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 66.9 1000 USD per square kilometre 175.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 108.69 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 98.97 1000 USD per square kilometre 190.82 1000 USD per square kilometre 91.85 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 131.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 185.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 53.84 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 146.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 169.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 22.46 1000 USD per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), China or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 189.34 1000 USD per square kilometre against 152.21 1000 USD per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between China and Mauritius?
37.13 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Mauritius rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
China ranks 16th and Mauritius ranks 13th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Mauritius: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/mauritius/">China vs Mauritius: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.