Chile vs Nicaragua: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Chile
21.04 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
22.31 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
91st
Nicaragua rank
89th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Chile
  • Nicaragua
510152025196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 22.31 1000 USD per square kilometre against 21.04 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 1.27 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 91st and Nicaragua ranks 89th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Nicaragua in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 6.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7156 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1970s 6.92 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.12 1000 USD per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 8.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.87 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1990s 12.92 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.52 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 17.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.83 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 19.99 1000 USD per square kilometre 18.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.82 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 21.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 22.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.8 1000 USD per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chile or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 22.31 1000 USD per square kilometre against 21.04 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chile and Nicaragua?
1.27 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Nicaragua rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chile ranks 91st and Nicaragua ranks 89th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Nicaragua: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/nicaragua/">Chile vs Nicaragua: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.