Cambodia vs New Zealand: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Cambodia
62.04 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
60.8 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
51st
New Zealand rank
52nd

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Cambodia
  • New Zealand
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 62.04 1000 USD per square kilometre against 60.8 1000 USD per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 1.24 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

Cambodia ranks 51st and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 140 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 15.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 24.99 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.18 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 12.08 1000 USD per square kilometre 29.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 17.06 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 11.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 34.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 23 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 16.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 39.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 22.39 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 25.48 1000 USD per square kilometre 48.28 1000 USD per square kilometre 22.81 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 52.92 1000 USD per square kilometre 57.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.18 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 59.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 61.3 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.27 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Cambodia or New Zealand?
Cambodia, at 62.04 1000 USD per square kilometre against 60.8 1000 USD per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Cambodia and New Zealand?
1.24 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Cambodia ranks 51st and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs New Zealand: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/new-zealand/">Cambodia vs New Zealand: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.