Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tunisia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
30.11 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
32.38 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
79th
Tunisia rank
77th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Tunisia
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 32.38 1000 USD per square kilometre against 30.11 1000 USD per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 2.27 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tunisia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 79th and Tunisia ranks 77th of 140 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 21.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 21.16 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0102 1000 USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 25.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 23.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.88 1000 USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 28.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 29.52 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 30.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 33.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.48 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 32.38 1000 USD per square kilometre against 30.11 1000 USD per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tunisia?
2.27 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tunisia?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tunisia rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 79th and Tunisia ranks 77th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tunisia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tunisia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tunisia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.