Angola vs Australia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Angola
5.89 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia
5.99 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
124th
Australia rank
123rd

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Angola
  • Australia
0246196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 5.99 1000 USD per square kilometre against 5.89 1000 USD per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.1 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Angola ranks 124th and Australia ranks 123rd of 140 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Australia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6974 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.51 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.7025 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.99 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.563 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.48 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.7686 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.86 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.09 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2000s 2.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.99 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2010s 4.48 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.9 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4193 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2020s 5.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3783 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Angola or Australia?
Australia, at 5.99 1000 USD per square kilometre against 5.89 1000 USD per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Angola and Australia?
0.1 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Australia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Australia rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Angola ranks 124th and Australia ranks 123rd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Australia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/australia/">Angola vs Australia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.