How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Namibia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Malta

0.151 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Namibia

0.1047 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Malta rank

129th

Namibia rank

132nd

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

Malta
Namibia

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.151 1000 USD per person against 0.1047 1000 USD per person in Namibia, a difference of 0.0463 1000 USD per person.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 129th and Namibia ranks 132nd of 140 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.2599 1000 USD per person	0.2266 1000 USD per person	0.0333 1000 USD per person	Malta
1970s	0.3452 1000 USD per person	0.1973 1000 USD per person	0.1479 1000 USD per person	Malta
1980s	0.3645 1000 USD per person	0.1692 1000 USD per person	0.1953 1000 USD per person	Malta
1990s	0.4222 1000 USD per person	0.1361 1000 USD per person	0.286 1000 USD per person	Malta
2000s	0.3817 1000 USD per person	0.1451 1000 USD per person	0.2366 1000 USD per person	Malta
2010s	0.2865 1000 USD per person	0.1318 1000 USD per person	0.1548 1000 USD per person	Malta
2020s	0.1639 1000 USD per person	0.1142 1000 USD per person	0.0497 1000 USD per person	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Malta or Namibia?: Malta, at 0.151 1000 USD per person against 0.1047 1000 USD per person in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Malta and Namibia?: 0.0463 1000 USD per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?: Malta ranks 129th and Namibia ranks 132nd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Namibia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/malta/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/malta/namibia/">Malta vs Namibia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 8,081 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.