Equatorial Guinea vs Gambia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0748 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Gambia
0.0562 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
135th
Gambia rank
136th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Gambia
00.20.40.6196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0748 1000 USD per person against 0.0562 1000 USD per person in Gambia, a difference of 0.0186 1000 USD per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th and Gambia ranks 136th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Gambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5804 1000 USD per person 0.2431 1000 USD per person 0.3373 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.3227 1000 USD per person 0.1949 1000 USD per person 0.1277 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.2349 1000 USD per person 0.142 1000 USD per person 0.093 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.1842 1000 USD per person 0.1196 1000 USD per person 0.0646 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.1287 1000 USD per person 0.1327 1000 USD per person 0.004 1000 USD per person Gambia
2010s 0.0965 1000 USD per person 0.0958 1000 USD per person 0.0007 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0786 1000 USD per person 0.0547 1000 USD per person 0.0239 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Equatorial Guinea or Gambia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0748 1000 USD per person against 0.0562 1000 USD per person in Gambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Equatorial Guinea and Gambia?
0.0186 1000 USD per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Gambia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Gambia rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th and Gambia ranks 136th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Gambia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/gambia-the/">Equatorial Guinea vs Gambia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 8,081 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.