Latvia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Latvia
4.27 % change on previous year
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
4.71 % change on previous year
in 2024
Latvia rank
42nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
39th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Latvia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 4.71 % change on previous year against 4.27 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0.44 % change on previous year.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Latvia ranks 42nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 39th of 163 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s -8.86 % change on previous year 1.36 % change on previous year 10.21 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 2.57 % change on previous year 6.57 % change on previous year 4.01 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 3.87 % change on previous year 5.11 % change on previous year 1.24 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2020s -0.7099 % change on previous year 3.12 % change on previous year 3.83 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Latvia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 4.71 % change on previous year against 4.27 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Latvia and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.44 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and United Republic of Tanzania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Latvia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Latvia ranks 42nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 39th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth-rate/latvia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth-rate/latvia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Latvia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 11,069 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.