Botswana vs New Caledonia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Botswana
5.95 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Caledonia
6.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
Botswana rank
23rd
New Caledonia rank
22nd

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Botswana
  • New Caledonia
-1000100200196219932024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 6.01 % change on previous year against 5.95 % change on previous year in Botswana, a difference of 0.06 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 38 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Botswana ranks 23rd and New Caledonia ranks 22nd of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 6 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 3.14 % change on previous year -0.389 % change on previous year 3.52 % change on previous year Botswana
1970s 9.57 % change on previous year -0.4429 % change on previous year 10.01 % change on previous year Botswana
1980s 9.3 % change on previous year 1.97 % change on previous year 7.34 % change on previous year Botswana
1990s -5.95 % change on previous year -5.83 % change on previous year 0.1255 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s 7.77 % change on previous year 0.7324 % change on previous year 7.04 % change on previous year Botswana
2010s 15.82 % change on previous year 4.31 % change on previous year 11.51 % change on previous year Botswana
2020s 48.77 % change on previous year -0.619 % change on previous year 49.39 % change on previous year Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Botswana or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 6.01 % change on previous year against 5.95 % change on previous year in Botswana as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Botswana and New Caledonia?
0.06 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Botswana and New Caledonia rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Botswana ranks 23rd and New Caledonia ranks 22nd of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs New Caledonia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth-rate/botswana/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-annual-growth-rate/botswana/new-caledonia/">Botswana vs New Caledonia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 11,069 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.